Asia’s Co-Firing Ambitions May Produce More Carbon Emissions
(Bloomberg) -- Using ammonia and hydrogen alongside fossil fuels in power plants may result in more emissions than simply burning coal or gas, a new study found, adding to skepticism over a decarbonization technology being embraced by some Asian nations.
Countries including Japan and South Korea are betting on co-firing technology to achieve reductions in carbon emissions from electricity generation in the next decade. But the plans have drawn criticism for being costly and inefficient, while the process could increase air pollution.
“This regional push to achieve large-scale co-combustion in fossil power plants threatens to drive vast ammonia and hydrogen production in exchange for minimal climate benefits at best,” Seaver Wang, co-director of the climate and energy team at the Breakthrough Institute, an Oakland, California-based research group, said in a report released Thursday.
Among recent projects, Japanese trading house Mitsui & Co. in June concluded a sales agreement to supply ammonia in large-scale co-firing at Jera Co.’s Hekinan Thermal Power Station. Meanwhile, South Korea is aiming to use hydrogen and ammonia in its existing coal power plants, with the two fuels making up more than 7% of the power mix in 2036.
Southeast Asian countries including Indonesia have also signed agreements to research domestic co-firing potential.
Proposals to co-fire ammonia or hydrogen in power plants to replace 20% to 30% of coal or gas burned still leave 80% to 70% of fossil fuel emissions, the Breakthrough Institute said. The benefits shrink even further after considering the energy required to manufacture and transport ammonia and hydrogen.
Further, significant electricity is needed for the compression and liquefaction of hydrogen for transoceanic shipping, and 10% to 20% of the hydrogen cargo may be lost during a long voyage.
If suppliers produce the ammonia and hydrogen using fossil fuels, co-combustion can result in “considerably more carbon emissions than if the power plants were to burn only pure coal or natural gas,” the report said.
Projects supplying hydrogen markets in Asia-Pacific use fossil fuel feedstocks to produce hydrogen and subsequently synthesize ammonia. But currently operating and announced pilot projects in the region have made only vague, non-binding commitments to install carbon capture equipment, the report said.
Even with best-case, low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia production, co-firing yields little climate benefits and represents “a wasteful use of valuable low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia,” it said.
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.
KEEPING THE ENERGY INDUSTRY CONNECTED
Subscribe to our newsletter and get the best of Energy Connects directly to your inbox each week.
By subscribing, you agree to the processing of your personal data by dmg events as described in the Privacy Policy.
More gas & LNG news

bp begins production from Raven Phase 2, offshore Egypt

Diamondback Nears Permian Deal to Buy Shale Producer Double Eagle

Australia’s Iron Ore Hub Reopens, Rio Mines Resume After Cyclone

Australia’s Iron Ore Export Hub to Reopen After Cyclone Weakens

Severe Cyclone Makes Landfall Near Australia’s Iron Ore Hub

Gas Traders Leave Essen Hungry for More on German Storage Plans

AG&P Pratham and THINK Gas toast the merger of their two brands

Russia, Turkey Discuss Gas Swap to Pay for Nuclear Plant

India LNG Buyers Negotiate US Deals Before Modi-Trump Summit
